Profound alternatives

Profound has no self-serve plan on its pricing page: on 15 October 2026 it listed a 7-day trial and custom Enterprise pricing (pricing page). If you want a published price you can start on today, these are the AI visibility tools to compare.

Each entry covers who the tool suits, its entry price, the AI engines it tracks and whether it drafts content. Competitor facts come from their public pages, linked, on the date shown.

1. CiteGaps

• Who it suits: Brands and agencies that want a flat monthly price, every answer collected live each week, and the content that closes each gap drafted for them.
• Entry price: $19 a month (Lite), $59 for all 5 engines (Starter).
• AI engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overview on Lite; all 5 (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overview) on Starter and Agency.
• Drafts content: Yes. Drafts the content that closes each gap: FAQ pages, comparison pages and outreach, written from the answers that show the gap.

CiteGaps vs Profound, side by side

2. Diploria

Checked 16 October 2026

• Who it suits: Teams that want many engines, 12 on paid plans, and are happy to budget in credits, or want to start on a free plan (pricing page).
• Entry price: Starter at $29 a month, or $23 a month billed yearly, with 1,500 credits (pricing page).
• AI engines: 12 engines on paid plans; the free plan answers from model memory only, on ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini (pricing page).
• Drafts content: Not listed. A recommendations board, and "Prompt Gaps" as "the fastest route from a report to a content brief" (features page).

CiteGaps vs Diploria, side by side

3. Peec AI

Checked 15 October 2026

• Who it suits: Teams that track three engines of their choice on a monthly plan priced by prompt count (pricing page).
• Entry price: Starter listed at $80 a month billed annually by PricingSaaS (September 2026).
• AI engines: Choose 3 of ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini and Naver AI; Perplexity is on Enterprise or as an add-on (pricing page).
• Drafts content: Not listed. "Recommended actions", plus prompt and competitor suggestions (pricing page).

CiteGaps vs Peec AI, side by side

4. Otterly.AI

Checked 15 October 2026

• Who it suits: Teams that want a low-priced entry plan with GEO audits and content briefs, adding Gemini or AI Mode as paid add-ons if they need them (pricing page).
• Entry price: Lite at $29 a month (pricing page).
• AI engines: ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot included; Gemini and AI Mode as add-ons (pricing page).
• Drafts content: Content briefs, not drafts. GEO recommendations (3 a week on Lite), GEO audits and content briefs (otterly.ai).

CiteGaps vs Otterly.AI, side by side

Competitor details were checked on 15 October 2026 and 16 October 2026 from their public pages, linked above. Plans change, so check their site for the latest. If something here is out of date, tell us at support@citegaps.com and we will correct it.

Profound and CiteGaps, head to head

For a row-by-row table with a source for every Profound fact, see CiteGaps vs Profound, or every tool at once on AI visibility tools compared.